What makes someone stop trying in a career?

  Hi, today I want to share an interesting topic, namely "What makes someone stop trying in a career?", The main reason why I chose this topic is because many people choose to give up when they feel they can no longer see the results they expect. There are many factors that can cause someone to give up on their career, both due to the individual's internal conditions and external factors from the work environment. Here are some of the main causes:

Internal Factors (From Within)

* Fatigue and Burnout: Excessive workloads, high demands, and lack of rest can lead to physical and mental exhaustion (burnout). This leaves a person feeling drained, depleted of energy, and unmotivated to do anything.

* Loss of Motivation and Purpose: If someone lacks clear career goals or feels their work is no longer meaningful, motivation will plummet. A monotonous routine without new challenges can also lead to boredom.

* Lack of Self-Confidence (Insecurity): Doubts about one's own abilities, fear of criticism or failure, can make someone reluctant to take risks or try new things, ultimately hindering career development.

* Lack of Skills or Knowledge: Feeling like they don't have enough skills or relevant knowledge to develop can lead someone to give up.

 * Difficulty Managing Stress and Frustration: When facing pressure or obstacles at work, if someone doesn't have a good strategy for managing stress and frustration, they are more likely to feel discouraged.

* Lack of Work-Life Balance: Focusing too much on work without making time for rest, hobbies, or personal life can lead to burnout and demotivation.

* Lack of Self-Awareness: Not recognizing one's own strengths and weaknesses can hinder career progress because someone doesn't know which areas need development or where they can best contribute.

External Factors (From the Work Environment or Otherwise)

* Poor Work Environment: Unhealthy relationships with coworkers or superiors, a lack of social support, or bullying in the office can be very draining and make someone want to give up.

* Lack of Appreciation and Recognition: When hard work and contributions aren't recognized, someone can feel unmotivated and lose the drive to give their best.

* Unclear Career Path: If there are no opportunities for growth, promotion, or learning new things, someone may feel stuck and decide to give up. 

* Job Doesn't Meet Expectations or Contract: Feeling that tasks and responsibilities deviate significantly from those initially agreed upon without adequate compensation can be frustrating.

* Financial Issues: Salary that doesn't match the workload or living expenses, as well as the costs of career development (e.g., training), can be significant obstacles.

* Lack of Information or Communication: If employees feel isolated from important information or changes within the company, they can feel unappreciated and disengaged.

* Frequent Job-Jumping ("Job-Jumping"): While there are sometimes advantages, frequently changing jobs without a clear goal can make it difficult for someone to find a stable and truly passionate career path.

* Lack of Family Support: Support from those closest to them also plays a crucial role. Lack of support can be an additional burden.

A person may experience more than just one factor, but rather a combination of several of the factors mentioned above, ultimately leading them to choose to quit or even abandon their career. It's important to identify the cause so you can find the right solution, whether that's through self-reflection, seeking new challenges, improving your work-life balance, or even considering a new work environment.

What is the human thinking type like from a philosophical perspective?

  Hi, today I want to share an interesting topic, namely about how humans think from a philosophical perspective, Understanding human thought from a philosophical perspective is a profound and complex journey, as philosophy itself is about questioning and reflecting on the foundations of existence, knowledge, values, reason, thought, and language. Human thought has been a central subject in various branches of philosophy for thousands of years.

Here are some of the main philosophical perspectives on human thought:

1. Rationalism

Key Figures: René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

* Core of Thought: Rationalism emphasizes that reason (ratio) is the primary source of knowledge and truth. The human mind has an innate capacity to understand reality through logic, deduction, and intellectual intuition, independent of sensory experience.

* Mode of Thought: Humans think using deductive reasoning from clear and distinct principles (e.g., mathematical axioms or innate ideas). Truth is considered accessible through pure thought, as in Descartes' famous statement: "I think, therefore I am" (Cogito, ergo sum). This suggests that consciousness and thought are the most fundamental evidence of existence.

 * Focus: A priori knowledge (knowledge independent of experience), the universality of truth, and the innate capacities of the mind.

2. Empiricism

Key Figures: John Locke, George Berkeley, David Hume

* Core Thought: Empiricism holds that sensory experience is the primary source of all knowledge. The human mind is initially a tabula rasa (blank slate) filled by experience.

* Way of Thinking: Humans think by collecting data from the senses, then analyzing, associating, and generalizing ideas from those experiences. The ideas or concepts we possess are copies or combinations of sensory impressions. Hume even argued that causality (a cause-and-effect relationship) is simply a habit of the mind that sees two events as always occurring together, not something inherently present in reality.

* Focus: A posteriori knowledge (knowledge derived from experience), the importance of observation, and the role of sensory data in shaping thought.

3. Idealism

Key Figures: George Berkeley, Immanuel Kant (Transcendental Idealism), G.W.F. Hegel

* Core Thought: Idealism asserts that reality is fundamentally mental or ideational. What we perceive as the physical world is actually a construct of the mind, or dependent on the mind.

* Way of Thinking:

* Berkeley (Subjective Idealism): "Existence is perceived" (Esse est percipi). Objects do not exist unless they are perceived by the mind. Therefore, human thought creates reality through their perceptions.

* Kant (Transcendental Idealism): Kant attempted to bridge rationalism and empiricism. He argued that the human mind does not passively receive data, but rather actively organizes and shapes sensory experience through innate categories of reason (such as space, time, causality). We cannot know the 'thing in itself' (Ding an sich), but only what appears to us, filtered and shaped by our cognitive structure.

 * Hegel (Absolute Idealism): The mind is part of the Universal Spirit (Geist) that develops through a dialectical process (thesis, antithesis, synthesis). Human thought is a manifestation of this Spirit's development toward complete self-understanding.

* Focus: The role of the mind in shaping reality, the limits of human knowledge, and the subjective or mental nature of existence.

4. Phenomenology

Key Figures: Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty

* Core of Thought: Phenomenology seeks to study phenomena or experiences as they appear in consciousness, without preconceptions or assumptions about external existence. The goal is to understand the essential structure of consciousness and experience.

* Way of Thinking: Through "epoche" (withholding judgment) or phenomenological reduction, humans attempt to set aside assumptions about the external world and focus on how the object or experience is presented directly to consciousness. This is a highly reflective and introspective way of thinking, aiming to reveal the essence of conscious experience. Merleau-Ponty adds the dimension of the lived body as central to perception and experience.

 * Focus: Conscious experience, intentionality of consciousness (consciousness is always about something), and the essence of how we experience the world.

5. Existentialism

Key Figures: Søren Kierkegaard, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus

* Core Thought: Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom, responsibility, and meaning in human existence. "Existence precedes essence," meaning that humans first exist and then define themselves through their choices and actions.

* Way of Thinking: Humans think by confronting the anxiety, absurdity, and responsibility of their choices in a world devoid of inherent meaning. Thinking here is the process of confronting the burden of freedom and creating personal meaning in a life lacking a predetermined purpose. It involves an awareness of mortality, finitude, and the need to act authentically.

* Focus: Freedom, individual responsibility, the meaning of life, existential anxiety, and authenticity.

6. Pragmatism

Key Figures: Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, John Dewey

* Core Thought: Pragmatism assesses truth and meaning based on their practical consequences and usefulness. An idea is true or meaningful if it works in practice and has verifiable effects.

* Ways of Thinking: Humans think with a focus on problem-solving and adaptation. Ideas are tested through experimentation and experience. Truth is not static, but rather dynamic and constantly evolving based on practical results. Thinking is a tool for acting and functioning in the world.

* Focus: Practical consequences, utility, problem-solving, and the instrumental nature of knowledge.

Each of these perspectives offers a different lens for understanding the complexity of the human mind. They are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and many philosophers attempt to integrate insights from different traditions. Studying the philosophy of human thought helps us be more critical of how we construct knowledge, understand reality, and live our lives.

Why Do People Set Irrelevantly High Standards?

  Hi, today I want to share an interesting topic, namely why people use irrelevant high standards, The reason I chose this topic is because there are several groups of people who consider relevant high standards as motivation, setting high standards can be a catalyst for progress, but sometimes these standards can be irrelevant to current conditions, even counterproductive. There are several underlying motives for someone setting high irrelevant standards, including:

* Past Successful Experiences: Someone may have achieved great success in the past by using certain standards. They may assume that the same standards will produce similar success today, even if conditions have changed drastically. This could be due to a reluctance to adapt or a fear of failure if trying a new approach.

* Idealism and Perfectionism: Some people have an innate tendency to strive for perfection. They set extremely high standards, even when resources, time, or circumstances don't allow for it. This is often driven by a desire to be the best or a belief that less than perfect results are unacceptable.

* External Pressure: Expectations from parents, superiors, coworkers, or even society at large can influence someone to set unrealistic standards. They may feel compelled to meet these expectations to gain recognition, avoid criticism, or maintain status. This could be related to a fear of disappointment or a need for validation.

* Lack of Understanding of Current Reality: Sometimes, a person may not fully understand changing circumstances or limitations. They may be uninformed or too focused on theory rather than practice, resulting in ungrounded standards.

* Comparing Oneself to Others (Ideals): In the age of social media, it's easy to compare oneself to others' idealized images, which often don't reflect reality. This can lead a person to set unrealistic standards for themselves, feeling compelled to "catch up" to the standards they see in others.

* Defense Mechanism: In some cases, setting extremely high and unattainable standards can be a defense mechanism. If they fail, they may justify their standards as being too high, thus avoiding the pain of true personal failure.

Understanding the motives behind these irrelevant standards is important to help a person adjust their expectations and set more realistic and adaptive goals.

Setting high standards isn't always harmful, but it can be problematic depending on the context, reasons, and how it's implemented. Here's an explanation of the benefits and dangers:

✅ Benefits of Setting High Standards

Encourages maximum achievement – You become more motivated to develop and less complacent.

Increases discipline and productivity – High standards often make someone more structured and responsible.

Builds a resilient character – Often builds a sense of perseverance and tolerance for adversity.

Inspires others – The environment can be encouraged to develop as well.

⚠️ Dangers of Setting Too High Standards

Unrealistic perfectionism – If the goal is impossible, you can get stuck in a cycle of never being satisfied and blaming yourself.

Chronic stress and mental exhaustion – Trying too hard without stopping can lead to burnout.

Decreased self-esteem – If you frequently fail to meet excessively high standards, you can develop a feeling of never being good enough.

Hinders progress – Someone may be afraid to try if they feel the results won't be perfect.

 Damaging social relationships – If expectations are also directed at others (e.g., partners, children, coworkers), it can create stress and conflict.

🔄 Healthy Ways to Set High Standards:

✅Stay realistic and flexible

✅Focus on the process, not just the outcome

✅Celebrate small progress, not just the end result

✅Use standards as guidance, not burden

✅Regularly re-evaluate whether they are still relevant

💡Summary

High standards are healthy when they are directed towards growth, not self-torture. The danger arises when you lose values such as gratitude, balance, and self-compassion.